Santuários rupestres no Ocidente da Hispania indo-europeia. Ensaio de tipologia e classificação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36707/palaeohispanica.v0i10.98Keywords:
Rock Sanctuaries, TypologieAbstract
Regarding a research project voted to the study of the so-called rock sanctuaries, this work aims to discuss the major problems within and in which way can its typological study be useful. Based on some specific examples, it will explore the special features that this kind of structures may present, which criteria should be considered to classify a place as a rock sanctuary and which typological groups can be distinguished according to this methodology.
References
Alfayé et al. 2001-02: S. Alfayé Villa, B. Díaz Ariño, P. Rodríguez Alvárez e
A. Gonzalo, “Actuación arqueológica en la piedra de sacrificios humanos, Monreal de Ariza (Zaragoza)”, Kalathos 20-21, 2001-02, pp. 251-259
Alfayé 2009: S. Alfayé Villa, Santuarios y Rituales en la Hispania Celtica, Oxford 2009.
Alföldy 1995: G. Alföldy, “Inscripciones, Sacrifícios y Mistérios: El Santuário Rupestre de Panóias. Informe Preliminar”, MM 36, 1995, 252-258.
Alföldy 1997: G. Alföldy, “Die Misterien von Panoias (Vila-Real, Portugal)”,
MM, 38, 1997, 176-246.
Argote 1732: J. C. de Argote, “Da cidade de Panóias e das antiguidades e vestígios que actualmente existem dela”, Memórias para História Eclesiás- tica do Arcebispado de Braga, VII, II, 1732, pp. 325-347.
Benito et al. 2003: L. Benito del Rey, H. A. Bernardo e M. Sanchéz Rodríguez, Santuarios rupestres prehistóricos de Miranda do Douro (Portugal) y de su entorno de Zamora y Salamanca (España), 2 vols., Salamanca 2003.
Benito e Grande 2000: L. Benito del Rey e R. Grande del Brío, Santuarios ru- pestres prehistóricos en el Centro-oeste de España, Salamanca 2000.
Blázquez 1983: J. Mª Blázquez, Primitivas Religiones Ibéricas: II, Religiones Prerromanas, Madrid 1983.
Búa 2000: J. C. Búa Carballo, Estudio Linguístico de la Teonímia Lusitano- Gallega, Tesis Doctoral inédita, Universidad de Salamanca 2000.
Correia Santos 2009: M. J. Correia Santos, “Lusitanos y Vettones en la Beira Interior portuguesa: la cuestión étnica en la encrucijada de la arqueología y los textos clásicos”, Actas de las Jornadas Arqueológicas de Cáceres: Lusitanos y Vettones, Cáceres 2009, 181-196.
Correia Santos in prensa a: M. J. Correia Santos, “Inscrições rupestres do Norte de Portugal: novos dados e problemática”, Syllogue Epigraphica Barcinonensis.
Correia Santos in prensa b: M. J. Correia Santos, “O sítio arqueológico do Cas- telo de Mogueira (São Martinho de Mouros, Resende) no contexto dos santuários rupestres a Hispânia indo-europeia”, Conimbriga.
Correia Santos et al. 2008: M. J. Correia Santos, T. G. Schattner, V. Pereira, “O Cabeço das Fráguas (Quinta de Sao Domingos), 2006: O Contributo da Primeira Campanha de Escavações”, Praça Velha, nº 24, Guarda, 2008, 175-202
Fábian García in prensa: J. F. Fábian García, “Altares rupestres, peñas sacras y rocas con cazoletas. Ocho nuevos casos abulenses y uno salmantino para la estadística, el debate y la reflexión”, MM 49.
Fabião 1993: C. Fabião, “A romanização do actual território português”, en: J. Mattoso (dir.), Historia de Portugal, Lisboa 1993, 203-299.
Fontes 1978: A. L. Fontes, “Aras romanas e terras de Barroso desaparecidas”, en: Sep. Milenário de S. Rosendo, Montalegre : [s.n.], Braga 1978.
Garcia 1991: J. M. Garcia, Religiões Antigas de Portugal. Aditamentos e observações às Religiões da Lusitânia de J. Leite de Vasconcelos, Fontes Epigráficas, Lisboa 1991.
García Quintela 2002: M. V. García Quintela, “Imágenes, textos, paisajes e ideas: los santuarios castreños en contexto”, en: M. A. Castiñeiras y F. Díez Platas (eds.), Profano y pagano en el arte gallego, S. 14, Santiago de Compostela 2002, 95-149.
García Quintela et al. 2006: M. V. García Quintela, R. Brañas Abad, F. Criado Boado, C. Parcero Oubiña e M. Santos Estévez, Soberanía e Santuarios na Galicia Castrexa, Touxosoutos, A Coruña 2006.
García Quintela e Santos Estévez 2008: M. V. García Quintela, M. Santos Estévez, Santuarios de la Galicia Céltica. Arqueología del Paisaje y Religiones Comparadas en la Edad del Hierro, Madrid 2008.
Gil 1985: J. Gil, “Notas sobre el Lusitano”, II CLCP, 365-370.
Guerra 2002: A. M. R. Guerra, “Omnibus Numinibus et Lapitearum: algumas reflexões sobre a nomenclatura teonímica do Ocidente peninsular”, Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia, 5.1, 2002, 147-149.
Hidalgo 2005: J. M. Hidalgo Cuñarro, Arte Rupestre Prehistórica do Eixo Atlântico, Vigo-Porto-Bruxelas 2005.
Lambrechts 1954 : P. Lambrechts, La exaltation de la tête ans la pensée et ans l’art des celtes, Bruges 1954.
Marco 1999: F. Marco Simón, “El paisaje sagrado en la España Indoeuropea”, en: J.Mª Blázquez Martínez y R. Ramos (eds.), Religion y Magia en la Antigüedad, Valencia 1999, 146-165.
Posac 1953: C. F. Posac Mon, “Solosancho (Ávila)’’, Noticiario Arqueológico Hispánico 1, 1953, 63-74.
Raepset-Charlier 1993: M. T. Raepset-Charlier, Diis Deabusque Sacrum. Formulaire votif et datation dans les trois Gaules et les deux Germanies, Paris 1993.
Rodríguez Colmenero 1979: A. Rodríguez Colmenero, Augusto e Hispania. Conquista y organización del norte peninsular, Deusto-Bilbao 1979.
Rodríguez Colmenero 1997: A. Rodríguez Colmenero, Aquae Flaviae I: Fontes Epigráficas, Chaves 19972.
Rodríguez Colmenero 1993: A. Rodríguez Colmenero, Corpus-Catalogo de inscripciones rupestres de época romana del cuadrante Noroeste de la Península Ibérica, A Coruña 1993, 76-77.
Rodríguez Colmenero 2000: A. Rodríguez Colmenero “Deorum Temene. Espacio sagrado y santuarios rupestres en la Gallaecia romana. Un intento de clasificación”, Actas do III Congreso de Arqueología Peninsular, vol. VI, Porto, 2000.
Russel Cortez 1947: F. Russel Cortez, Panóias: cividade dos Lapiteas. Subsídios para o Estudo dos Cultos Orientais e da vida provincial romana na região do Douro, Porto 1947.
Ruiz Zapatero e Álvarez Sanchís 1999: G. Ruiz Zapatero e J. R. Álvarez Sanchís, “Ulaca la Pompeya vettona”, Revista de Arqueología 216, 1999, 36-47.
Santos Estévez 2002: M. Santos Estévez, “Arte rupestre y recintos rituales en la Edad del Hierro”, en: M. A. Castiñeiras y F. Díez Platas (eds.), Profano y pagano en el arte gallego, S. 14, Santiago de Compostela 2002, 39-94.
Silva 1986: A. C. F. Silva, A Cultura Castreja do Noroeste de Portugal, Paços de Ferreira 1986.
Untermann 1962: J. Untermann, “Áreas e movimentos linguísticos na Hispania pré-romana”, Revista de Guimarães 72.1-2, 1962, 5-61.
Untermann 1965: J. Untermann, “Misceláneas epigráfico-linsgüísticas”, AEArq
38, 1965, 8-25.
Untermann 1992: J. Untermann, “Los etnónimos de la Hispania antigua y las lenguas prerromanas de la Península Ibérica”, en: M. Almagro-Gorbea yG. Ruiz Zapatero (eds.), Paleoetnologia de la Península Ibérica, Complutum 2-3, Madrid 1992, 19-33.
Untermann 1999: J. Untermann, “Alteuropäisch in Hispanien”, en: E. Eggers,
J. Becker, J. Udolph y D. Weber, Florilegium linguisticum. Festschrift für Wolfgang P. Schmidt zum 70. Geburstag, Frankfurt am Main 1999, 509-518.
Tente e Lourenço 2000: C. Tente e S. Lourenço, “O Cadeirão da quinta do Pé do Coelho e o Penedo dos Mouros: primeira interpretação como santuários rupestres”, Revista de Guimarães, volume especial, Actas do Congresso de Proto-história Europeia, vol. 2, Guimarães 2000, 775-792.
Tranoy 1981: A. Tranoy, La Galice Romaine. Recherches sur le Nord-Ouest de la Péninsule Ibérique dans l’Antiquité, Paris 1981.
Tranoy 2004: A. Tranoy , “Panóias ou les rochers des dieux“, Conimbriga 43, 2004, 85-97.
Vaz 1987: J. L. I. Vaz, Roteiro Arqueológico do Concelho de Viseu, Viseu 1987, 23-25.
Vaz 2002: J. L. I. Vaz, “Tipologia dos santuários rupestres de tradição paleohispânica em território português”, Loquuntur Saxa, Religiões da Lusitânia, Lisboa 2002, 39-42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Professional standards and ethical policies
a) Palaeohispanica’s editorial board
Details concerning the journal’s internal organization can be found at this website.
b) Authors’ responsibilities
As an implicit condition for publishing in Palaeohispanica, authors are expected to adhere to all the ethical and professional principles that are shared across all research fields and academic publications. By submitting a contribution for peer review, potential authors guarantee that their work is original, that it constitutes a significant contribution to its research field and has not been published elsewhere.
All submitted manuscripts ought to contain bibliographic references at the end of the paper as well as an indication of how the research that culminated in the article was funded.
Likewise, authors must agree to incorporate any relevant changes that peer reviewers suggest as well as to include any recommendations that the editorial committee includes in the manuscript’s proofs at the end of the editorial process.
The journal expects its authors, reviewers, editors and staff members to all conduct themselves professionally by treating others with respect and civility. Should any sort of untoward situation arise, such as (self) plagiarism, conflicts of interest or aggressive behaviour on the author’s part, the following actions will be taken:
- Plagiarism and the republication of articles
Plagiarism is defined as the reproduction of a text or other materials found in different publications without the original source being adequately cited. Accordingly, material can still be plagiarized even when it has been tweaked or paraphrased. Plagiarism constitutes a serious ethical violation; furthermore, there can be legal ramifications for violating an author’s rights in cases where the reproduced material has been previously published. Authors who want to cite published work must do so by including complete references to the original materials and by including any quotations within quotation marks. Graphs and images can only be reproduced with the express permission of the original author and must include a citation below said image or graphic according to the rules laid out on the journal’s website. If a peer reviewer or the editorial board detects any instance of plagiarism (whether of one’s own or another’s work), the manuscript will automatically be disqualified.
- Conflicts of interest
In most instances an individual who works at the same institution as an author or one of the co-authors is automatically barred from evaluating a potential contribution. The journal’s editors must always be aware of possible conflicts of interest and are required to recuse themselves from any decision-making process, whenever there is even the appearance of a possible conflict of interest.
c) The peer-review process
Palaeohispanica employs peers to evaluate externally all contributions, with this being understood as obtaining the opinion of an established expert over the merits of every potential contribution. In addition to completing the relevant form, reviewers are expected to suggest any pertinent bibliography that was not included in the original version of the manuscript.
Furthermore, the peer-review process is double blind, meaning that both authors’ anonymity as well as the reviewers’ impartiality and independence are guaranteed. Reader reviews will be treated with the utmost confidentiality. As is the case with all respectable research journals, the editors of Palaeohispanicawill not share with a third party the identity of a peer reviewer, the contents of his or her review or any correspondence resulting from the review process. Likewise, reviewers are required to adhere to the same strict standard of confidentiality: neither manuscripts nor the contents of any correspondence between an author and the editors can be shared with a third party without the written and express consent of the journal’s editors.
While strictly speaking authors are not held to the same standards (they can, for instance, solicit advice from co-authors and colleagues as they revise and amend a manuscript in accordance with the recommendations found in a reviewer’s report), the public airing of a reviewer’s report or of the correspondence with the editorial team constitutes untoward behavior. Any author who acts in such a way will automatically forfeit his or her right to the journal’s confidentiality.
- Aggressive behaviour
Should the editorial committee be made aware of any untoward behaviour on the author’s part towards external reviewers, other authors or the journal’s editors/staff, that author’s submission will immediately be withdrawn from the consideration process.
All participants in the publication process, including editors, authors, peer reviewers, and member’s of the journal’s staff are expected to meet basic standards of professional courtesy and to respect the fundamental rules and guidelines concerning the peer-review and publication processes. Under any circumstance, personal attacks and verbal assault (whether expressed orally or through writing) are completely unacceptable. Accordingly, the journal reserves the right to reject the contribution of any author who repeatedly violates these principles or refuses to cooperate with the editors and reviewers during the normal evaluation and publication processes.
d) Editorial ethics
The editorial team at Palaeohispanica will bring an end to any dishonest research practice by submitting every proposal to a careful review process that will begin before the selection of possible peer reviewers. Should anything questionable be detected, an author will be asked to provide relevant explanations and then be told to review his/her text so as to meet the journal’s quality standards. If an author does not make the requested changes, the manuscript will not be submitted for double-blind peer review and, accordingly, will not be published. The editorial board is always available to discuss and debate with authors any misunderstanding that could have given rise to such a situation.
e) Copyright and journal access
Journal content falls under the protection of licence Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA. Access the all journal content is open and free of charge.
f) Journal archive
Given that the Institución Fernando el Católico is an established and important publishing house, it is extremely unlikely that access to the journal’s contents could be compromised in anyway within the foreseeable future. The contents of Palaeohispanica will be stored in IFC’s servers even if the journal ceases to be published.
g) Ownership and management of the journal
The journal Palaeohispanica is edited and run by the institution «Fernando el Católico», an independent entity of the Excelentísima Diputación de Zaragoza.
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portability by contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
Ethical and confidentiality policy of Palaeohispanica can be consulted here.
Privacy policy
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portabilityby contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
The IFC’s privacy and data protection policy can be consulted at https://tiendaifc.dpz.es/Sites/dpz/paginasPersonalizadas/Modelo2/inicio.aspx. It can also be found in the journal’s the top navigation menu: http://ifc.dpz.es/ojs/index.php/palaeohispanica/dpd
Names and email addresses submitted to this journal will only be used for tasks related to the journal and will not be shared with any third party or used for any other purpose.
In accordance with the Regulation UE 2016/679, information gathered by the Institución Fernando el Católico de la Excma. Diputación de Zaragoza (IFC) will be used for carrying out the functions of an academic publication, the handling of claims, appeals, complaints, suggestions, surveys as well as any other activity involved in the management of the journal.
Cubic Factory is in charge of handling said data. They can be contacted at cubic@cubicfactory.com.
Data can be given to public agencies with the relevant competencies and in case of legal obligations.
Those who are interested can exercise their rights of access, correction, suppression, limitation of the use, opposition and portability by contacting ifc@dpz.es.
Users can also go to the Agencia Española de Protección de Datos to make any complaints that they feel is necessary.
User information will be kept during the period in which it is needed to complete the task for which said information was provided in the first place or for the period necessary to comply with any legal obligations. Once a given objective has been completed, personal data that is not part of fulfillment of public service will be blocked until the applicable period has ended.
Ethical and confidentiality policy of Palaeohispanica can be consulted here.